Redundancy with a Single Citect HMI

HI, I have a question as it relates to redundancy. I have upgraded a project that previously had a local and remote HMI and was configured with the appropriate primary and secondary computers, IO servers, alarms servers, and trend servers in a single cluster.

However, they have opted to remove the second HMI, leaving only one. The control device I am communicating to (Micronet) has two CPUs, and I want to be able to communicate to the second controller if the first one goes down. I only have one ethernet port on the HMI though, so I'm wondering if it is possible to configure two data paths from that single port. I tried a few different configurations that I thought would work: adding a the secondary IO server to the primary computer (threw an error about the IO server needing a unique IP address) and adding a secondary device to the Primary IO server (also threw an error about the standby device needing a primary on the same cluster--not sure this error makes sense to me).

Any thoughts as to if this is possible and where I am going wrong on the configuration?

Parents
  • Thank you for your reply Olivier, this is exactly what I was looking for! I tested it out, and it works!

    One question though--I noticed that if I fail one CPU it does indeed swap to the second, but then if I reconnect the first and then disconnect the second, it does not swap back to the first. All the data says PENDING. Is there something additional I have to do to enable this or is this by design?
Reply
  • Thank you for your reply Olivier, this is exactly what I was looking for! I tested it out, and it works!

    One question though--I noticed that if I fail one CPU it does indeed swap to the second, but then if I reconnect the first and then disconnect the second, it does not swap back to the first. All the data says PENDING. Is there something additional I have to do to enable this or is this by design?
Children
No Data