BITAND function?

Have you tried an expression like (tag BITAND 0x0200) > 0 ?  This may alleviate the limitation of coercing a value > 255 into a digital.

Have you tried an expression like (tag BITAND 0x0200) > 0 ?  This may alleviate the limitation of coercing a value > 255 into a digital.

Great suggestion. I would use (tag BITAND 0x200) <> 0 however to prevent problems with the 15th bit being interpreted as the integer sign flag.

Thanks Stuart that seems to work. I used Patricks suggestion as i might need all bits. Much easier using address then adding extra cicode. And can also populate via equipment module. Thankyou

Thanks Patrick for your suggestion. That seems to work.

I had tried something similiar earlier but without the brackets which confused it.